State v. DePew

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. DePew

640 N.E.2d 840, 70 Ohio St. 3d 1219

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 9, 1994·No. No. 87-1334·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We deny the motions. Depew’s 1988 appeal to this court was not a first appeal as of right; therefore, he had no constitutional right to counsel, hence no constitutional right to effective assistance. See State v. Buell (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 1211, 639 N.E.2d 110.

Motions denied.

[1221]*1221Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Wright, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We deny the motions. Depew’s 1988 appeal to this court was not a first appeal as of right; therefore, he had no constitutional right to counsel, hence no constitutional right to effective assistance. See State v. Buell (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 1211, 639 N.E.2d 110.

Motions denied.

[1221]*1221Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Wright, J., dissents.

State v. DePew, 640 N.E.2d 840, 70 Ohio St. 3d 1219 (Ohio 1994).

Pincite

640 N.E.2d 840 (State v. DePew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related