State v. Denya

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Denya

953 A.2d 654, 288 Conn. 906, 2008 Conn. LEXIS 323

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided July 9, 2008·No. 18182·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 107 Conn. *907 App. 800 (AC 27540), is granted, limited to the following issue:

Bruce R. Lockwood, assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Marc P. Mercier, in opposition. Decided July 9, 2008

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court abused its discretion in modifying the terms of probation regarding electronic monitoring?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18182.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 107 Conn. *907 App. 800 (AC 27540), is granted, limited to the following issue:

Bruce R. Lockwood, assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Marc P. Mercier, in opposition. Decided July 9, 2008

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court abused its discretion in modifying the terms of probation regarding electronic monitoring?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18182.

State v. Denya, 953 A.2d 654, 288 Conn. 906, 2008 Conn. LEXIS 323 (Colo. 2008).

Pincite

953 A.2d 654 (State v. Denya) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related