State v. Denya

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Denya

953 A.2d 654, 288 Conn. 906, 2008 Conn. LEXIS 323

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedJuly 9, 2008

Docket18182

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 953 A.2d 654 (State v. Denya) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Denya, 953 A.2d 654, 288 Conn. 906, 2008 Conn. LEXIS 323 (Colo. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 107 Conn. *907 App. 800 (AC 27540), is granted, limited to the following issue:

Bruce R. Lockwood, assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Marc P. Mercier, in opposition. Decided July 9, 2008

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court abused its discretion in modifying the terms of probation regarding electronic monitoring?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18182.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 107 Conn. *907 App. 800 (AC 27540), is granted, limited to the following issue:

Bruce R. Lockwood, assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Marc P. Mercier, in opposition. Decided July 9, 2008

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court abused its discretion in modifying the terms of probation regarding electronic monitoring?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18182.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

953 A.2d 654, 288 Conn. 906, 2008 Conn. LEXIS 323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-denya-conn-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack