State v. Dent

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Dent

525 S.W.3d 219, 2017 WL 3597075, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 802

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 22, 2017·No. ED 104370·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Leland Dent (“Defendant”) was convicted by jury of one count of first-degree assault, in violation of Section 565.050, and one count of armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.015. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

The judgment of the trial court is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Leland Dent (“Defendant”) was convicted by jury of one count of first-degree assault, in violation of Section 565.050, and one count of armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.015. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

The judgment of the trial court is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Dent, 525 S.W.3d 219, 2017 WL 3597075, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 802 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

525 S.W.3d 219 (State v. Dent) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.