State v. DeNoma
This text of 925 N.E.2d 1004 (State v. DeNoma) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ross App. No. 09CA3089, 2009-Ohio-6547. Reported at 124 Ohio St.3d 1510, 2010-Ohio-799, 922 N.E.2d 972. On motion for reconsideration and judicial notice. Motion fails for want of four votes.
Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., would grant the motion for reconsideration, accept the appeal, and hold the cause for the decision in 2008-2502, State v. Bodyke, Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
925 N.E.2d 1004, 125 Ohio St. 3d 1417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-denoma-ohio-2010.