State v. DeNoma

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. DeNoma

925 N.E.2d 1004, 125 Ohio St. 3d 1417

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 5, 2010·No. 2010-0093·Published

Opinion

Ross App. No. 09CA3089, 2009-Ohio-6547. Reported at 124 Ohio St.3d 1510, 2010-Ohio-799, 922 N.E.2d 972. On motion for reconsideration and judicial notice. Motion fails for want of four votes.

Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., would grant the motion for reconsideration, accept the appeal, and hold the cause for the decision in 2008-2502, State v. Bodyke, Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387.

[1418] Lanzinger, J., would grant the motion for reconsideration and accept the appeal. Pfeifer, O’Connor, and Cupp, JJ., would deny the motion for reconsideration.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ross App. No. 09CA3089, 2009-Ohio-6547. Reported at 124 Ohio St.3d 1510, 2010-Ohio-799, 922 N.E.2d 972. On motion for reconsideration and judicial notice. Motion fails for want of four votes.

Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., would grant the motion for reconsideration, accept the appeal, and hold the cause for the decision in 2008-2502, State v. Bodyke, Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387.

[1418] Lanzinger, J., would grant the motion for reconsideration and accept the appeal. Pfeifer, O’Connor, and Cupp, JJ., would deny the motion for reconsideration.

State v. DeNoma, 925 N.E.2d 1004, 125 Ohio St. 3d 1417 (Ohio 2010).

Pincite

925 N.E.2d 1004 (State v. DeNoma) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related