State v. DENEGALL

986 So. 2d 1289, 2008 WL 2679166
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 10, 2008
DocketSC07-1600
StatusPublished

This text of 986 So. 2d 1289 (State v. DENEGALL) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. DENEGALL, 986 So. 2d 1289, 2008 WL 2679166 (Fla. 2008).

Opinion

986 So.2d 1289 (2008)

STATE of Florida, Petitioner,
v.
Zachery Antonio DENEGALL, Respondent.

No. SC07-1600.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 10, 2008.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, and Robert J. Krauss, Assistant Attorney General, Bureau Chief, and Ronald Napolitano, Assistant Attorney General, for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Denegall v. State, 975 So.2d 505 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007), in which the Second District Court of Appeal cited as authority its decision in Griffin v. State, 946 So.2d 610 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007), quashed, 980 So.2d 1035 (Fla.2008), and, as it had done in Griffin, certified conflict with the First District Court of Appeal's decision in Ridgeway v. State, 892 So.2d 538 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005), approved by Griffin v. State, 980 So.2d 1035 (Fla.2008). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

We stayed proceedings in this case pending disposition of Griffin. We have since decided Griffin, in which we quashed in part the Second District Court's underlying *1290 Griffin decision and approved the First District Court's Ridgeway decision. See Griffin v. State, 980 So.2d 1035 (Fla. 2008). We thus issued an order directing respondent in the present case to show cause why we should not exercise jurisdiction, quash the Second District Court's Denegall decision, and remand for reconsideration in light of our decision in Griffin. Respondent did not respond to that order, thereby constructively conceding that we should so proceed.

We accordingly grant the petition for review in the present case. The decision under review is quashed and this matter is remanded to the Second District Court for reconsideration upon application of this Court's decision in Griffin.

It is so ordered.

QUINCE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ridgeway v. State
892 So. 2d 538 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Denegall v. State
975 So. 2d 505 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Griffin v. State
980 So. 2d 1035 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2008)
Griffin v. State
946 So. 2d 610 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
986 So. 2d 1289, 2008 WL 2679166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-denegall-fla-2008.