State v. Demars

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Demars

493 S.W.3d 925, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 733, 2016 WL 4013705

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 26, 2016

DocketWD 78316

StatusPublished

This text of 493 S.W.3d 925 (State v. Demars) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Demars, 493 S.W.3d 925, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 733, 2016 WL 4013705 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam:

Frank Demars appeals, following a jury trial, his convictions of six counts of first-degree statutory sodomy, one count of first-degree child molestation, and one count of sexual misconduct with a child, for which he was sentenced to a total of forty-nine years’ imprisonment. Demars argues that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction of one of the six counts of first-degree statutory sodomy, and that the trial court plainly erred in excluding evidence from his girlfriend that he was repulsed by anal intercourse. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

Per Curiam:

Frank Demars appeals, following a jury trial, his convictions of six counts of first-degree statutory sodomy, one count of first-degree child molestation, and one count of sexual misconduct with a child, for which he was sentenced to a total of forty-nine years’ imprisonment. Demars argues that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction of one of the six counts of first-degree statutory sodomy, and that the trial court plainly erred in excluding evidence from his girlfriend that he was repulsed by anal intercourse. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

493 S.W.3d 925, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 733, 2016 WL 4013705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-demars-moctapp-2016.