State v. Demalignon
884 P.2d 588, 131 Or. App. 259, 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 1577
Opinion
Defendant appeals the sentence imposed on his conviction for criminal mischief in the first degree. ORS 164.365. At trial, he objected to the imposition of restitution because the trial court failed to consider defendant’s ability to pay. He assigns error to the sentence of restitution. The state concedes that the trial court erred in imposing restitution, because it failed to consider defendant’s ability to pay. ORS 137.106(2)(b). We accept the concession and remand for resentencing.
Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Demalignon, 884 P.2d 588, 131 Or. App. 259, 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 1577 (Or. Ct. App. 1994).
884 P.2d 588 (State v. Demalignon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.