State v. DeLoreto

541 A.2d 910, 14 Conn. App. 813, 1988 Conn. App. LEXIS 201
CourtConnecticut Appellate Court
DecidedApril 26, 1988
Docket6398
StatusPublished

This text of 541 A.2d 910 (State v. DeLoreto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. DeLoreto, 541 A.2d 910, 14 Conn. App. 813, 1988 Conn. App. LEXIS 201 (Colo. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We have fully reviewed the defendant’s claim of evidentiary error, to the extent that the claim has been properly presented to us on appeal and to the extent that the claim coincides with the objections made at trial. With that background in mind, and affording the defendant’s claim its proper scope of review, we find the claim to be without merit.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
541 A.2d 910, 14 Conn. App. 813, 1988 Conn. App. LEXIS 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-deloreto-connappct-1988.