State v. Delgado

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Delgado

782 A.2d 1248, 258 Conn. 913, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 413

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 20, 2001·No. SC 16588·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 64 Conn. App. 312 (AC 20155), is granted, limited to the following issue:

[914] The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16588. Michael R. Corsello, in support of the petition. Richard F. Jacobson, special assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided September 20, 2001

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude: (1) the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion for a continuance or mistrial? and (2) the trial court did not deny the defendant’s constitutional rights, under the federal constitution, of confrontation used to present a defense, by declining to disclose the victim’s treatment record to the defendant?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 64 Conn. App. 312 (AC 20155), is granted, limited to the following issue:

[914] The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16588. Michael R. Corsello, in support of the petition. Richard F. Jacobson, special assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided September 20, 2001

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude: (1) the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion for a continuance or mistrial? and (2) the trial court did not deny the defendant’s constitutional rights, under the federal constitution, of confrontation used to present a defense, by declining to disclose the victim’s treatment record to the defendant?”

State v. Delgado, 782 A.2d 1248, 258 Conn. 913, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 413 (Colo. 2001).

Pincite

782 A.2d 1248 (State v. Delgado) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related