State v. Delay

Ohio Court of Appeals

State v. Delay

87 Ohio Law. Abs. 458, 1960 Ohio App. LEXIS 1189

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Delay. Read the opinion of the Court — 87 Ohio Law. Abs. 449 →

Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided March 1, 1960·No. No. 6223·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Submitted on motion of lessor-appellees for a reconsideration of the Court’s former ruling. The Court has carefully considered the questions raised by movant. We find no determinative questions raised by the motion which were not raised and heretofore' decided by this Court.

Motion for reconsideration is hereby overruled. A separate entry may be prepared accordingly.

Wiseman, P. J., Crawford and Kerns, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Submitted on motion of lessor-appellees for a reconsideration of the Court’s former ruling. The Court has carefully considered the questions raised by movant. We find no determinative questions raised by the motion which were not raised and heretofore' decided by this Court.

Motion for reconsideration is hereby overruled. A separate entry may be prepared accordingly.

Wiseman, P. J., Crawford and Kerns, JJ., concur.

State v. Delay, 87 Ohio Law. Abs. 458, 1960 Ohio App. LEXIS 1189 (Ohio Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

87 Ohio Law. Abs. 458 (State v. Delay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.