State v. DeJesus

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. DeJesus

889 A.2d 818, 276 Conn. 929, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 563

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided December 14, 2005·No. SC 17576·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 92 Conn. App. 92 (AC 24176), is granted, limited to the following issue:

*930 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17576. Decided December 14, 2005 Frederick W. Fawcett, supervisory assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Adele V. Patterson, assistant public defender, in opposition.

“Whether the Appellate Court properly held that the trial court’s charge on conspiracy was deficient because it did not set forth an essential element, the object of the conspiracy?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 92 Conn. App. 92 (AC 24176), is granted, limited to the following issue:

*930 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17576. Decided December 14, 2005 Frederick W. Fawcett, supervisory assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Adele V. Patterson, assistant public defender, in opposition.

“Whether the Appellate Court properly held that the trial court’s charge on conspiracy was deficient because it did not set forth an essential element, the object of the conspiracy?”

State v. DeJesus, 889 A.2d 818, 276 Conn. 929, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 563 (Colo. 2005).

Pincite

889 A.2d 818 (State v. DeJesus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related