State v. Dehler

924 N.E.2d 842, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1538
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Dehler. Read the opinion of the Court — 130 Ohio St. 3d 259
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 14, 2010·No. 2009-1974·Published

Opinion

Trumbull App. No. 2008-T-0061, 2009-Ohio-5059. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. IV and V; cause held for the decisions in 2008-2502, State v. Bodyke, Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387; and 2008-0991 and 2008-0992, Chojnacki v. Cordray, Warren App. No. CA2008-03-040; and briefing schedule stayed.

Moyer, C.J., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II. Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., would accept the appeal on all Propositions of Law. O’Connor, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. Ill and IV only. O’Donnell, J., dissents and would remand the cause to the court of appeals for a ruling on the certified conflict. Lanzinger, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Dehler, 924 N.E.2d 842, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1538 (Ohio 2010).

924 N.E.2d 842 (State v. Dehler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Bodyke, H-07-040 (12-5-2008)
2008 Ohio 6387 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2008)