State v. Deen

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Deen

625 So. 2d 968, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10670, 1993 WL 424201

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 22, 1993·No. No. 92-1792·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

GOSHORN, Judge.

The State of Florida appeals the order of the trial court suppressing the marijuana found in an automobile which Lewis was driving and in which Deen was a passenger. A review of the undisputed testimony presented at the suppression hearing shows that the police seized the marijuana as the result of a valid search incident to the lawful arrest of Lewis. See New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454, 101 S.Ct. 2860, 69 L.Ed.2d 768 (1981); Gustafson v. Florida, 414 U.S. 260, 94 S.Ct. 488, 38 L.Ed.2d 456 (1973); United States v. Robinson, 414 U.S. 218, 94 S.Ct. 467, 38 L.Ed.2d 427 (1973); State v. Smith, 529 So.2d 1226 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); State v. Boulia, 522 So.2d 528 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). The record also shows that Deen failed to demonstrate that he had a legitimate expectation of privacy in the car in which he was a mere passenger. See State v. Fontana, 566 So.2d 937 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), aff'd, 581 So.2d 585 (Fla.1991); Amoss v. State, 547 So.2d 716 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). Accordingly, we reverse the suppression order that the trial court entered in favor of both Deen and Lewis and remand the cause for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GOSHORN, Judge.

The State of Florida appeals the order of the trial court suppressing the marijuana found in an automobile which Lewis was driving and in which Deen was a passenger. A review of the undisputed testimony presented at the suppression hearing shows that the police seized the marijuana as the result of a valid search incident to the lawful arrest of Lewis. See New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454, 101 S.Ct. 2860, 69 L.Ed.2d 768 (1981); Gustafson v. Florida, 414 U.S. 260, 94 S.Ct. 488, 38 L.Ed.2d 456 (1973); United States v. Robinson, 414 U.S. 218, 94 S.Ct. 467, 38 L.Ed.2d 427 (1973); State v. Smith, 529 So.2d 1226 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); State v. Boulia, 522 So.2d 528 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). The record also shows that Deen failed to demonstrate that he had a legitimate expectation of privacy in the car in which he was a mere passenger. See State v. Fontana, 566 So.2d 937 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), aff'd, 581 So.2d 585 (Fla.1991); Amoss v. State, 547 So.2d 716 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). Accordingly, we reverse the suppression order that the trial court entered in favor of both Deen and Lewis and remand the cause for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ., concur.

State v. Deen, 625 So. 2d 968, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10670, 1993 WL 424201 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

625 So. 2d 968 (State v. Deen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related