State v. Deck

898 P.2d 1370, 135 Or. App. 538, 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 1036
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided July 19, 1995·No. 10-94-01640, 10-94-01681; CA A84611 (Control), A84612·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Under a plea agreement, defendant pleaded guilty to burglary in the first degree and attempted rape in the first degree. In a separate proceeding, he pleaded guilty to sexual abuse in the third degree. Two separate judgments were entered, but the convictions were consolidated for sentencing. On the burglary conviction,1 the trial court imposed an 80-month upward-departure incarceration term “subject to ORS 137.635.”

The state concedes that the trial court erred in imposing the upward-departure sentence, because defendant had not been convicted of any felony designated in the applicable subsection of ORS 137.635. We accept the concession.

Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Deck, 898 P.2d 1370, 135 Or. App. 538, 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 1036 (Or. Ct. App. 1995).

898 P.2d 1370 (State v. Deck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 137.635
Oregon § 137.635