State v. Dean

864 S.W.2d 434, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1781, 1993 WL 453620
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Dean. Read the opinion of the Court — 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 920
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 9, 1993·No. Nos. 62101 & 63557·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction, by a jury, of stealing over $150.00, § 570.030.3(1), RSMo 1986. He was sentenced by the court as a prior and persistent offender to a thirteen year prison term. He also appeals the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Dean, 864 S.W.2d 434, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1781, 1993 WL 453620 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

864 S.W.2d 434 (State v. Dean) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.