State v. Dean

458 So. 2d 999, 1984 La. App. LEXIS 9828
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided November 7, 1984·No. No. CR83-902·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

DOMENGEAUX, Judge.

The defendant, Ivy Lee Dean, was charged by Bill of Information on Novem[1000]*1000ber 22, 1982, with possession of a controlled dangerous substance, pentazocine, a violation of La.R.S. 40:967 C.

On June 22, 1983, following a trial by jury, the defendant was found guilty as charged by a unanimous verdict. On July 12, 1983, the defendant made a motion for a new trial which was denied, and the defendant waived any further delay in sentencing.

The trial judge committed defendant to the Department of Corrections to serve four years in a State penal institution.

Defendant appeals his conviction and sentence alleging four assignments of error. However, as he has failed to brief any of those assignments of error, they are considered abandoned. State v. Dewey, 408 So.2d 1255 (La.1982), and State v. Carlisle, 315 So.2d 675 (La. 1975). We are therefore limited in this appeal to a consideration of those errors discoverable by a mere inspection of the pleadings and proceedings and without inspection of the evidence, i.e., patent errors. La.C.Cr.P. Art. 920(2).

We have conducted a careful examination of the record before us pursuant to the provisions of La.C.Cr.P. Art. 920, and finding no errors patent on the record, we hereby affirm the conviction.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Dean, 458 So. 2d 999, 1984 La. App. LEXIS 9828 (La. Ct. App. 1984).

458 So. 2d 999 (State v. Dean) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Hinton
477 So. 2d 1307 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1985)