State v. Deabler
This text of 518 A.2d 121 (State v. Deabler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
Dennis Deabler appeals from his conviction for operating a motor vehicle after revocation as an habitual offender, 29 M.R. S.A. § 2298 (Supp.1985), following a jury-waived trial by the Superior Court, Knox County. Deabler contends that the suspicion articulated by the arresting officer for stopping Deabler’s car was not objectively reasonable. We will reverse the denial of a motion to suppress based on a determination of reasonable suspicion only if clearly erroneous. State v. Cyr, 501 A.2d 1303, 1305 (Me.1985). Here, the Superior Court properly held that the officer’s articulated suspicion was objectively reasonable. See State v. Fillion, 474 A.2d 187 (Me.1984).
The entry is:
Judgment affirmed.
All concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
518 A.2d 121, 1986 Me. LEXIS 942, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-deabler-me-1986.