State v. De La Cruz

North Dakota Supreme Court

State v. De La Cruz

2017 ND 276, 904 N.W.2d 478

CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 7, 2017

Docket20170207

StatusPublished

This text of 2017 ND 276 (State v. De La Cruz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. De La Cruz, 2017 ND 276, 904 N.W.2d 478 (N.D. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Miguel Ángel Rodriguez. De La Cruz appealed from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of patronizing a minor for commercial sexual activity. On appeal,- De La Cruz argues the guilty verdict is not supported by sufficient evidence. We conclude the State presented sufficient evidence and summarily affirm the criminal judgment under N.D.R.App,P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C. J. Jon J. Jensen Jérod E. Tufte Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Miguel Ángel Rodriguez. De La Cruz appealed from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of patronizing a minor for commercial sexual activity. On appeal,- De La Cruz argues the guilty verdict is not supported by sufficient evidence. We conclude the State presented sufficient evidence and summarily affirm the criminal judgment under N.D.R.App,P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C. J. Jon J. Jensen Jérod E. Tufte Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2017 ND 276, 904 N.W.2d 478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-de-la-cruz-nd-2017.