State v. De Arment
Opinion
On July 7, 1992 the Defendant was sentenced to DC-92-204, eight (8) years for Theft, to be served consecutive to the term given in Silver Bow County.
On July 7, 1992, the Defendant was sentenced to DC-92-216, seven (7) years for Theft, A Common Scheme, to be served consecutive to the term imposed in DC-92-204.
On May 6,1993, the Defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
The Defendant was present and proceeded pro se. The state was not represented.
Before hearing the application, the Defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also to increase it if such is possible. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.
After careful consideration, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.
The reason for the decision is the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct pursuant to Section 46-18-904(3), MCA. The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to deem inadequate or excessive as required to overcome the presumption per Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
The Sentence Review Board wishes to thank Mr. De Arment for representing himself in this matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
263 Mont. 51 (State v. De Arment) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.