State v. De Abreu
This text of 613 So. 2d 453 (State v. De Abreu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of Florida, Petitioner,
v.
Douglas DE ABREU, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Gypsy Bailey, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for petitioner.
No appearance, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
We originally accepted jurisdiction of De Abreu v. State, 593 So.2d 233 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), based on apparent conflict with State v. Ginebra, 511 So.2d 960 (Fla. 1987). On consideration of the record and briefs, we perceive that the opinion under review here is based upon the rules changes adopted by our decision In re Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, 536 So.2d 992 (Fla. 1988), which superseded Ginebra to the extent of any inconsistency. Accordingly, there is no conflict, and we conclude that jurisdiction was granted improvidently. This review is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
*454 BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, SHAW, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
613 So. 2d 453, 1993 WL 22160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-de-abreu-fla-1993.