State v. Daye

162 So. 3d 371, 2015 La. LEXIS 437, 2015 WL 1185827
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided February 27, 2015·No. No. 2014-K-1191·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

|,The state’s application is granted, the ruling of the court of appeal is reversed, and the sentence is vacated. The case is remanded to the district court-for resen-tencing in accordance with the views expressed by the dissenting judge of the court of appeal. See La.C.Cr.P. art. 894.1.

JOHNSON, C.J. dissents and would deny the writ. HUGHES, J., dissents and would deny the writ. CRICHTON, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Daye, 162 So. 3d 371, 2015 La. LEXIS 437, 2015 WL 1185827 (La. 2015).

162 So. 3d 371 (State v. Daye) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. McGowan
258 So. 3d 609 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2017)
State of Louisiana v. Dustin R. McGowan
Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2017