State v. Day

2026 Ohio 317

• Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
• Decided: February 2, 2026
• Docket: 2025-P-0064
• Status: Published

Opinion

[Cite as State v. Day, 2026-Ohio-317.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PORTAGE COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 2025-P-0064

Plaintiff-Appellee, Criminal Appeal from the - vs - Court of Common Pleas

DEOLIA A. DAY, Trial Court No. 2023 CR 01293 C Defendant-Appellant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY

Decided: February 2, 2026 Judgment: Appeal dismissed

Connie J. Lewandowski, Portage County Prosecutor, 241 South Chestnut Street, Ravenna, OH 44266 (For Plaintiff-Appellee).

Deolia A. Day, pro se, PID# W112-879, Ohio Reformatory for Women, 1479 Collins Avenue, Marysville, OH 43040 (Defendant-Appellant).

MATT LYNCH, P.J.

{¶1} On September 10, 2025, appellant, Deolia A. Day, filed a pro se notice of

appeal and motion for leave to file a delayed appeal pursuant to App.R. 5(A). No response

in opposition was filed.

{¶2} On her notice of appeal, appellant indicates that she seeks to appeal from

the trial court’s September 1, 2025 judgment of conviction and sentence. However, upon

a review of the trial court’s docket, it appears that the entry was issued on March 13,

2024. A timely notice of appeal from the March 13, 2024 entry was due no later than April 12, 2024, which was not a holiday or weekend. The appeal is untimely by approximately

1 year and 5 months.

{¶3} “[A] party who wishes to appeal from an order that is final upon its entry

shall file the notice of appeal required by App.R. 3 within 30 days of that entry.” App.R.

4(A)(1).

{¶4} App.R. 5(A)(1) states:

{¶5} “After the expiration of the thirty day period provided by App.R. 4(A) for the

filing of a notice of appeal as of right, an appeal may be taken by a defendant with leave

of the court to which the appeal is taken in the following classes of cases:

{¶6} “(a) Criminal proceedings . . .”

{¶7} App.R. 5(A)(2) further provides that “[a] motion for leave to appeal shall be

filed with the court of appeals and shall set forth the reasons for the failure of the appellant

to perfect an appeal as of right.”

{¶8} In her motion for leave, as reasons for failing to file a timely appeal,

appellant states that she did not have adequate counsel and she did not understand her

plea negotiations or her appellate rights. Appellant further states that she “lacked

opportunity and guidance toward filing a timely appeal.”

{¶9} The “Written Plea of Guilty” signed by appellant on February 5, 2024,

includes an acknowledgement that she understood that she did not lose all of her rights

to appeal by entering a plea of guilty and that any appeal in a criminal case must be filed

within 30 days after sentencing.

{¶10} Pursuant to the “Written Plea of Guilty,” appellant was advised of and

understood her appellate rights. Further, while lack of opportunity and guidance might

PAGE 2 OF 4

Case No. 2025-P-0064 justify a reasonable delay of time in filing an appeal, given the length of time of over a

year before initiating an appeal, it is evident that appellant was not diligent in taking the

proper steps to protect her own rights. Therefore, we find that appellant has failed to set

forth a valid reason for filing the appeal more than one year after she was sentenced and

well beyond the 30-day time period prescribed in App.R. 4(A)(1).

{¶11} Accordingly, appellant’s motion for leave to file a delayed appeal is

overruled, and the appeal is hereby dismissed.

JOHN J. EKLUND, J.,

EUGENE A. LUCCI, J.,

concur.

PAGE 3 OF 4

Case No. 2025-P-0064 JUDGMENT ENTRY

For the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion of this court, it is ordered that

appellant’s motion for leave to file a delayed appeal is overruled, and the appeal is hereby

dismissed.

Any pending motions are hereby overruled as moot.

Costs to be taxed against appellant.

PRESIDING JUDGE MATT LYNCH

JUDGE JOHN J. EKLUND, concurs

JUDGE EUGENE A. LUCCI, concurs

THIS DOCUMENT CONSTITUTES A FINAL JUDGMENT ENTRY

A certified copy of this opinion and judgment entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Ohio Rules of Appellate Procedure.

PAGE 4 OF 4

Case No. 2025-P-0064