State v. Day

37 La. Ann. 785
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided October 15, 1885·No. No. 149·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Todd, J.

The defendant was charged by information with cutting-one John Cullen with a razor with intent to murder, under Sec. 791r R. S.

He was convicted of inflicting a wound less than mayhem, an offense denounced by Sec. 794, R. S.

He appeals to this Court, and assigns as error that the verdict was not responsive to the charge and that the variance between the two-was fatal.

There have been frequent adjudications by this Court upon this point, and upon the authority of the same the assignment must be sustained. State vs. Murdock, 35 A., 729; State vs. Pratt, 10 A., 191; State vs. Johns, 32 A., 812.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the verdict of the jury and the sentence thereon be annulled, avoided and reversed, and the accused discharged. -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Day, 37 La. Ann. 785 (La. 1885).

37 La. Ann. 785 (State v. Day) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Antoine
180 So. 465 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1938)
State v. Fradella
111 So. 423 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1927)