State v. Dawson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Dawson

733 P.2d 461, 84 Or. App. 138, 1987 Ore. App. LEXIS 3021

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedFebruary 25, 1987

DocketC84-07-33033; CA A36323

StatusPublished

This text of 733 P.2d 461 (State v. Dawson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Dawson, 733 P.2d 461, 84 Or. App. 138, 1987 Ore. App. LEXIS 3021 (Or. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

This case was remanded to us from the Oregon Supreme Court, for reconsideration in light of State v. Owens, 302 Or 196, 729 P2d 524 (1986). In our first opinion, 77 Or App 306, 307, 713 P2d 45 (1986), we held that the warrantless testing of the contents of a paperfold seized from defendant’s jacket was unlawful under Article 1, § 9 of the Oregon Constitution. That holding is wrong under Owens.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

This case was remanded to us from the Oregon Supreme Court, for reconsideration in light of State v. Owens, 302 Or 196, 729 P2d 524 (1986). In our first opinion, 77 Or App 306, 307, 713 P2d 45 (1986), we held that the warrantless testing of the contents of a paperfold seized from defendant’s jacket was unlawful under Article 1, § 9 of the Oregon Constitution. That holding is wrong under Owens.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

733 P.2d 461, 84 Or. App. 138, 1987 Ore. App. LEXIS 3021, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-dawson-orctapp-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack