State v. Dawson
This text of 151 S.E.2d 203 (State v. Dawson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant having- entered said pleas of guilty, his appeal presents for review only whether error appears on the face of the record proper. S. v. Darnell, 266 N.C. 640, 146 S.E. 2d 800. The record on appeal contains one assignment of error, namely, that “(t)he sentences imposed by the court were excessive.” The assignment is without merit. The sentence in #21,728 is authorized by G.S. 14-22; and the sentence in #21,727 is authorized by G.S. 14-54. The court’s authority to provide that such sentences shall run consecutively is well established. 1 Strong, N. C. Index, Criminal Law § 133. No error appearing, the judgments .of the court below are affirmed.
It is noteworthy that the evidence presented to the presiding judge prior to pronouncement of said judgments was sufficient to support convictions of defendant for the capital felonies charged in the indictments. The impression prevails that defendant was well and ably represented by his court-appointed counsel.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
151 S.E.2d 203, 268 N.C. 603, 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-dawson-nc-1966.