State v. Davis

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Davis

722 P.2d 38, 80 Or. App. 322, 1986 Ore. App. LEXIS 3115

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJuly 23, 1986

Docket84-4203-C-1; CA A35436

StatusPublished

This text of 722 P.2d 38 (State v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Davis, 722 P.2d 38, 80 Or. App. 322, 1986 Ore. App. LEXIS 3115 (Or. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

RICHARDSON, P. J.

Defendant appeals convictions for attempted murder, ORS 161.405, 163.115, assault in the first degree, ORS 163.185, and robbery in the first degree. ORS 164.415. The convictions arose from an incident in which defendant stabbed the victim with a knife while trying to steal money and property from him. The trial court sentenced defendant to 20 years in prison, with a 10-year minimum, on the attempted murder conviction and “merged” the assault conviction into the attempted murder only for the purposes of sentencing. It also sentenced him to 20 years in prison, with a 10-year minimum, on the robbery conviction, to run consecutively with the sentence on the other two convictions. Defendant assigns error to the trial court’s failure to merge the convictions for assault and robbery into a single conviction for attempted murder.¹

The state concedes that the trial court should have merged the assault conviction with the attempted murder conviction, because it relied on the same events to prove the assault and the attempted murder. State v. Lavender, 68 Or App 514, 682 P2d 823, rev den 297 Or 547 (1984). It argues that the attempted murder and robbery conviction are separate and should not be merged.

In State v. Fickes, 36 Or App 361, 584 P2d 770 (1978), we held that when the state relies on the same act to establish the use of physical force element of robbery and to prove attempted murder, the robbery conviction merges into the attempted murder conviction. The state relied on the stabbing to prove the use of physical force element of both robbery and attempted murder; under Fickes, defendant’s robbery conviction must be merged into his attempted murder conviction.

Remanded for entry of judgment of conviction for attempted murder only and for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RICHARDSON, P. J.

Defendant appeals convictions for attempted murder, ORS 161.405, 163.115, assault in the first degree, ORS 163.185, and robbery in the first degree. ORS 164.415. The convictions arose from an incident in which defendant stabbed the victim with a knife while trying to steal money and property from him. The trial court sentenced defendant to 20 years in prison, with a 10-year minimum, on the attempted murder conviction and “merged” the assault conviction into the attempted murder only for the purposes of sentencing. It also sentenced him to 20 years in prison, with a 10-year minimum, on the robbery conviction, to run consecutively with the sentence on the other two convictions. Defendant assigns error to the trial court’s failure to merge the convictions for assault and robbery into a single conviction for attempted murder.¹

The state concedes that the trial court should have merged the assault conviction with the attempted murder conviction, because it relied on the same events to prove the assault and the attempted murder. State v. Lavender, 68 Or App 514, 682 P2d 823, rev den 297 Or 547 (1984). It argues that the attempted murder and robbery conviction are separate and should not be merged.

In State v. Fickes, 36 Or App 361, 584 P2d 770 (1978), we held that when the state relies on the same act to establish the use of physical force element of robbery and to prove attempted murder, the robbery conviction merges into the attempted murder conviction. The state relied on the stabbing to prove the use of physical force element of both robbery and attempted murder; under Fickes, defendant’s robbery conviction must be merged into his attempted murder conviction.

Remanded for entry of judgment of conviction for attempted murder only and for resentencing.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

722 P.2d 38, 80 Or. App. 322, 1986 Ore. App. LEXIS 3115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-davis-orctapp-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack