State v. Davis

708 P.2d 651, 76 Or. App. 394, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 3999

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted for burglary in the first degree, theft in the first degree and possession of a controlled substance. He appeals only the conviction for burglary. The charge and conviction was for first degree burglary based on the use a burglary tool: a power drill. ORS 164.225(1)(a). The state concedes that the power drill was not proven to be a burglary tool. State v. Graves, 299 Or 189, 700 P2d 244 (1985); State v. Sells, 299 Or 198, 702 P2d 68 (1985). We agree.

Because the court found that defendant committed a burglary, we vacate the judgment on the burglary in the first degree and remand for entry of a judgment of conviction for burglary in the second degree and for resentencing.