State v. Davis

911 A.2d 67, 188 N.J. 574, 2006 N.J. LEXIS 1708

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 28, 2006·Published

Opinion

This matter having come before the Court on a petition for certification of the judgment in A-6351-02, and the Court having filed an Order on August 8, 2006, denying certification with language commenting on the Appellate Division’s remand,

And the Court having determined that the entry of that Order was improvident,

And good cause appearing;

[575]*575IT IS ORDERED that the Court’s Order of August 8, 2006, is vacated; and it is further

ORDERED that further consideration of the within matter shall abide the Court’s disposition of A-39-06, State v. Parks, 188 N.J. 355, 907 A.2d 1014 (2006).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

And the Court having determined that the entry of that Order was improvident,

And good cause appearing;

[575]*575IT IS ORDERED that the Court’s Order of August 8, 2006, is vacated; and it is further

ORDERED that further consideration of the within matter shall abide the Court’s disposition of A-39-06, State v. Parks, 188 N.J. 355, 907 A.2d 1014 (2006).

State v. Davis, 911 A.2d 67, 188 N.J. 574, 2006 N.J. LEXIS 1708 (N.J. 2006).

Pincite

911 A.2d 67 (State v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

State v. Parks

907 A.2d 1014 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2006)

Opinion

Related