State v. Davis

201 N.W.2d 258, 189 Neb. 140, 1972 Neb. LEXIS 676
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Davis. Read the opinion of the Court — 185 Neb. 433
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided October 13, 1972·No. Nos. 38473, 38474·Published

Opinion

Boslaugh, J.

The., defendant pleaded guilty to separate informations charging burglary and escape. He was sentenced to 2 years’ imprisonment for. the burglary and 2 to 3 years’ imprisonment for the escape, the sentences to run consecutively. He appeals, claiming the sentences are excessive, his accomplice having received a l7year sentence for the burglary.

The presentence report is not a part of the record in this court. The record does not show what sentence the accomplice. received or any circumstances concerning him. ...

. The statements of the county attorney, made in open court at the time of sentencing and which stand um challenged, indicate, that the defendant had a record of previous offenses, some felonies, dating back to at least 1968. When the defendant escaped from custody he again resorted to criminal conduct.

There is nothing in the record which would justify a reduction of the sentences imposed in these cases. The judgments are, therefore, affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Davis, 201 N.W.2d 258, 189 Neb. 140, 1972 Neb. LEXIS 676 (Neb. 1972).

201 N.W.2d 258 (State v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.