State v. Davis
157 S.E.2d 622, 272 N.C. 111, 1967 N.C. LEXIS 981
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Davis. Read the opinion of the Court — 267 N.C. 126 →
Opinion
The evidence of the patrolman made out a clear case of pre-arranged racing and of speeding. However, in fairness to the defendant, it must be admitted his evidence, supported by a number of witnesses, tended strongly to show his presence elsewhere at the time of the offenses charged. The evidence was sharply conflicting with the testimony of the highway patrolman. The jury, as was its function, resolved the conflict against the defendant. Error of law in the trial does not appear.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Davis, 157 S.E.2d 622, 272 N.C. 111, 1967 N.C. LEXIS 981 (N.C. 1967).
157 S.E.2d 622 (State v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.