State v. Davis

110 S.E.2d 614, 251 N.C. 93, 1959 N.C. LEXIS 523
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 21, 1959·Published

Opinion

PER Ctjeiam.

The sole assignment of error relates to the interrogation of a defense witness by the court. Defendant contends that it amounted to an “expression of ... opinion on the weight and credibility [94] of the testimony” of the witness. G.S. 1-180. A careful consideration of the challenged questions and the responses thereto leads to the definite conclusion that questions asked by the court were merely of a clarifying nature. State v. Stevens, 244 N.C. 40, 44, 92 S.E. 2d 409. To be entitled to a new trial defendant must show prejudice. State v. Creech, 229 N.C. 662, 672, 51 S.E. 2d 348. No prejudicial error has been shown.

No error.

Higgins, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Davis, 110 S.E.2d 614, 251 N.C. 93, 1959 N.C. LEXIS 523 (N.C. 1959).

110 S.E.2d 614 (State v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Stevens
92 S.E.2d 409 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1956)
State v. . Creech
51 S.E.2d 348 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1949)
State v. Creech
229 N.C. 662 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1949)