State v. Davis

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Davis

573 S.W.3d 764

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Davis. Read the opinion of the Court — 533 S.W.3d 781 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 7, 2019·No. No. ED 106421·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Edward Davis appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a jury trial for assault, unlawful use of a weapon and armed criminal action. The evidence was sufficient to support the conviction and there was no error in the admission of evidence. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Edward Davis appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a jury trial for assault, unlawful use of a weapon and armed criminal action. The evidence was sufficient to support the conviction and there was no error in the admission of evidence. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Davis, 573 S.W.3d 764 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

573 S.W.3d 764 (State v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.