State v. Davis

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Davis

573 S.W.3d 764

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 7, 2019

DocketNo. ED 106421

StatusPublished

This text of 573 S.W.3d 764 (State v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Davis, 573 S.W.3d 764 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Edward Davis appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a jury trial for assault, unlawful use of a weapon and armed criminal action. The evidence was sufficient to support the conviction and there was no error in the admission of evidence. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Edward Davis appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a jury trial for assault, unlawful use of a weapon and armed criminal action. The evidence was sufficient to support the conviction and there was no error in the admission of evidence. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

573 S.W.3d 764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-davis-moctapp-2019.