State v. Davis

180 S.W.3d 81, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1921, 2005 WL 3526569
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Davis. Read the opinion of the Court — 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1886
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 27, 2005·No. ED 85744·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, William D. Davis, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of attempted forcible rape, in violation of section 566.030 RSMo (2000), forcible sodomy, in violation of Section 566.060 RSMo (2000), and kidnapping, in violation of Section 565.110 RSMo (2000). The trial court found defendant to be a prior and persistent offender and sentenced him to fifteen years imprisonment on the rape and sodomy counts, to be served concurrently, and ten years imprisonment on the kidnapping count, to be served consecutively.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Davis, 180 S.W.3d 81, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1921, 2005 WL 3526569 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

180 S.W.3d 81 (State v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.