State v. Davis

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Davis

43 S.W.3d 906, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 811, 2001 WL 506500

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 15, 2001

DocketNo. ED 78184

StatusPublished

This text of 43 S.W.3d 906 (State v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Davis, 43 S.W.3d 906, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 811, 2001 WL 506500 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Davis (Defendant) appeals his conviction of possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute, section 195.211, RSMo 2000. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find there is sufficient evidence from which a reasonable juror might have found Defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Grim, 854 S.W.2d 403, 407 (Mo. banc 1998). An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Davis (Defendant) appeals his conviction of possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute, section 195.211, RSMo 2000. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find there is sufficient evidence from which a reasonable juror might have found Defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Grim, 854 S.W.2d 403, 407 (Mo. banc 1998). An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 S.W.3d 906, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 811, 2001 WL 506500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-davis-moctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack