State v. Davis

544 S.W.2d 600, 1976 Mo. App. LEXIS 2668
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 23, 1976·No. No. 37858·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

CLEMENS, Judge.

A jury found defendant guilty of stealing a display cabinet worth over $50. As a second offender, the court sentenced him to two years’ imprisonment. He has appealed, contending only that the trial court erred in refusing his verdict-directing instruction submitting stealing property worth less than $50. Defendant concedes evidence by the owner showed the stolen property was worth at least $700 and that there was no evidence of a lesser value.

As declared in State v. Manley, 513 S.W.2d 703[6, 7] (Mo.App.1974), and cases cited therein, a verdict-directing instruction must have evidentiary support, and an instruction on stealing less than $50 need not be given where the only evidence of value is that the stolen property is worth over $50.

Judgment affirmed.

WEIER, P. J., and DOWD, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Davis, 544 S.W.2d 600, 1976 Mo. App. LEXIS 2668 (Mo. Ct. App. 1976).

544 S.W.2d 600 (State v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Walters
636 S.W.2d 122 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1982)
State v. Bellah
603 S.W.2d 707 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1980)
State v. Childers
581 S.W.2d 619 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1979)
State v. Wilhite
580 S.W.2d 763 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1979)