State v. Davis

888 So. 2d 847, 2004 La. LEXIS 3792, 2004 WL 3078634
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Davis. Read the opinion of the Court — 848 So. 2d 557
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided December 10, 2004·No. No. 2004-KK-3001·Published

Opinion

In re State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial [848]*848Writs,. Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. H, No. 00-3428; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 04-K-1405.

Writ granted. The trial court’s ruling is reversed.' The defendant’s motion for mistrial is denied. We find no substantial prejudice to the defendant where the witness testified that he talked to the defendant “when he was in jail” without a more specific reference to another crime. La. C.Cr.P. arts. 770 and 771. The trial court may admonish the jury if it determines that it is appropriate.

CALOGERO, C.J., would deny the writ. JOHNSON, J., would deny the writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Davis, 888 So. 2d 847, 2004 La. LEXIS 3792, 2004 WL 3078634 (La. 2004).

888 So. 2d 847 (State v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.