State v. Davis

541 So. 2d 831, 1989 WL 31792
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided April 7, 1989·No. 88-K-3138·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

541 So.2d 831 (1989)

STATE of Louisiana
v.
Eugene DAVIS, Jr.

No. 88-K-3138.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 7, 1989.

Granted. The case is remanded to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal for reconsideration in light of the entire jury charge given by the trial court. If the trial court properly instructed the jurors that the state had the burden of proving every essential element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt, In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358, 90 S.Ct. 1068, 25 L.Ed.2d 368 (1970); La.C.Cr.P. art. 804, the court of appeal should consider whether the facts necessarily found by the jury in its verdict satisfy the due process standard of Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), see, State v. Captville, 448 So.2d 676 (La.1984), and whether any ambiguity in the trial court's charge on circumstantial evidence was harmless error. See, Pope v. Illinois, 481 U.S. 497, 107 S.Ct. 1918, 95 L.Ed.2d 439 (1987); Rose v. Clark, 478 U.S. 570, 106 S.Ct. 3101, 92 L.Ed.2d 460 (1986).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Davis, 541 So. 2d 831, 1989 WL 31792 (La. 1989).

541 So. 2d 831 (State v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. McLemore
640 So. 2d 847 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1994)
State v. Flowers
574 So. 2d 448 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1991)
State v. Davis
562 So. 2d 1173 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1990)
State v. Bacot
551 So. 2d 29 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1989)