State v. Davis

47 Iowa 634
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided March 20, 1878·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Beck, J.

L criminal appeal. Counsel for defendant insist that we cannot entertain jui’isdiction of the cause for the reason that no final judgment was rendered in the case by the court below, from which, alone, an appeal can be prosecuted in this court. The objection is raised both upon motion and in the argument upon the merits of the case: The position of counsel is well taken. "We have recently held that no appeal in a criminal case can be taken from an intermediate order, and that the statute provides for appeals to this court only from final judgments. The State v. Swearengen, 43 Iowa, 336. The same rule is applicable as well to appeals .prosecuted by the State as by the defendant. Code, § § 4521, 4522.

Other questions raised in the case, involving the regularity and sufficiency of the trial before eleven jurors, cannot be determined, as we cannot entertain jurisdiction of the case.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Davis, 47 Iowa 634 (iowa 1878).

47 Iowa 634 (State v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State of Iowa v. Latrice L. Lacey
Supreme Court of Iowa, 2021
State v. Hellickson
162 N.W.2d 390 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1968)
State v. Anderson
60 N.W.2d 794 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1953)
State v. Evans
82 N.W. 429 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1900)