State v. Davis

682 P.2d 104, 106 Idaho 563, 1984 Ida. App. LEXIS 455
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Davis. Read the opinion of the Court — 107 Idaho 215
Idaho Court of Appeals·Decided April 27, 1984·No. No. 14446·Published

Opinion

SWANSTROM, Judge.

Robert Davis appeals from an indeterminate fifteen-year sentence to the custody of the Board of Correction, imposed upon a conviction for burglary. The sole issue is whether the district court abused its sentencing discretion.

Davis was charged with the first degree burglary of an auto paint and body shop in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho. I.C. §§ 18-1401, -1402. The presentence report shows that he has three prior felony convictions, as [564]*564well as numerous misdemeanor offenses. Having reviewed the full record and having considered the sentence review criteria set forth in State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 650 P.2d 707 (Ct.App.1982), we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion. The sentence is affirmed.

WALTERS, C.J., and BURNETT, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Davis, 682 P.2d 104, 106 Idaho 563, 1984 Ida. App. LEXIS 455 (Idaho Ct. App. 1984).

682 P.2d 104 (State v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Toohill
650 P.2d 707 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 1982)