State v. Davis

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Davis. Read the opinion of the Court — 133 Haw. 102
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided December 19, 2013·No. SCWC-12-0000074·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0000074 19-DEC-2013 01:22 PM

SCWC-12-0000074

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, vs.

TERRY J. DAVIS, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0000074; CRIM. NO. 1DTC-11-032838)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee’s Application for Writ of Certiorari filed on November 5, 2013, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, December 19, 2013.

John M. Tonaki and /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald Taryn R. Tomasa, for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

Keith Kaneshiro and /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. Brian R. Vincent, for respondent /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Davis, (haw 2013).

State v. Davis (State v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.