State v. Davis
693 So. 2d 540, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 89, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 2103, 1997 WL 207983
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Davis. Read the opinion of the Court — 720 So. 2d 220 →
Opinion
We have for review Davis v. State, 680 So.2d 601 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), in which the district court ruled that the trial judge’s routine comments on reasonable doubt constituted fundamental error. This decision conflicts with Wilson v. State, 686 So.2d 597 (Fla. 1996), wherein we reached a contrary result. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. We quash the decision of the district court of appeal and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Davis, 693 So. 2d 540, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 89, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 2103, 1997 WL 207983 (Fla. 1997).
693 So. 2d 540 (State v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Davis v. State
680 So. 2d 601 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)