State v. Davis
Opinion
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
STATE OF DELAWARE, ) ) v. ) ID No. 2308002805 ) KEENAN DAVIS, ) ) Defendant. )
ORDER
On this 28th day of May, 2024, upon consideration of Defendant Keenan
Davis’s (“Defendant”) pro se Motion for Credit for Time Previously Served (the
“Motion”),1 the sentence imposed upon Defendant, and the record in this case, it
appears to the Court that:
1. On January 2, 2024, Defendant pled guilty to Driving Under the Influence
of Alcohol, Reckless Driving, and Menacing. On January 8, 2024, the Court
sentenced him to (1) Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol, two years of Level V
supervision, suspended after three months for one year of Level III supervision; (2)
Reckless Driving, thirty days of Level V supervision, suspended for one year of
Level III supervision; and (3) Menacing, thirty days of Level V supervision,
suspended for one year of Level III supervision.2
1 D.I. 5. Defendant sent a letter to this Court to request credit for time previously served. The Court interprets this letter as the Motion. 2 D.I. 4. 2. On January 30, 2024, Defendant filed the instant Motion, in which he asks
the Court to credit time previously served to his sentence in this case. He asserts
that he has not received credit for two periods of incarceration. First, Defendant
states that he turned himself in on December 18, 2023 at 9:00 a.m., spent the day in
custody at the Howard R. Young Correctional Institution, and then was released in
the evening. Second, he states that, around that same date, he was arrested in the
evening, placed in custody, and then released the next morning at 5:30 a.m.3
3. The factual record contradicts Defendant’s assertion that he is entitled to
credit time in this case. Upon a request for information, the Delaware Department
of Correction emailed the Court that Defendant has never been incarcerated in this
case. In a separate case, ID No. 2209012249, Defendant was held as intoxicated on
September 25, 2022, was monitored by pretrial services from May 1, 2023, until he
was sentenced to three months of unsuspended Level V supervision on January 8,
2024, and was subsequently released to probation on March 30, 2024. Hence,
Defendant is not entitled to the credit time described in the Motion.
4. For the foregoing reasons, Defendant’s Motion is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
______________________________ Sheldon K. Rennie, Judge
3 D.I. 5.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Davis (State v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.