State v. Davis
623 A.2d 1024, 225 Conn. 918, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 128
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 29 Conn. App. 801 (AC 11099), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. What is the standard of proof that the state must meet to establish the violation of a condition of probation?
“2. Did the state meet the appropriate standard in the circumstances of this case?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Davis, 623 A.2d 1024, 225 Conn. 918, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 128 (Colo. 1993).
623 A.2d 1024 (State v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Hill
773 A.2d 931 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2001)
State v. Merritt, No. Cr96-489402 (Dec. 3, 1998)
1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 14725 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1998)
State v. Deptula
639 A.2d 1049 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1994)
State v. Davis
641 A.2d 370 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1994)
State v. Carey
636 A.2d 840 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1994)
State v. Sailor
635 A.2d 1237 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1994)
State v. Johnson
635 A.2d 885 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1993)
State v. Villano
634 A.2d 907 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1993)
State v. Scott
626 A.2d 817 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1993)