State v. Davis

215 A.2d 414, 153 Conn. 228, 1965 Conn. LEXIS 425
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedDecember 9, 1965
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 215 A.2d 414 (State v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Davis, 215 A.2d 414, 153 Conn. 228, 1965 Conn. LEXIS 425 (Colo. 1965).

Opinion

Shannon, J.

In a trial to the court the defendant was found guilty of the crime of obtaining, by false *229 pretenses, money and. goods of the total value of $93.20. He claims that the state did not prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The defendant filed a request for a finding in which he stated the question to be reviewed was that “upon all the evidence” he was not proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. To review that claim a finding was not necessary and should not have been requested since that claim could be tested only by the evidence as printed in the appendices to the briefs. State v. Taylor, 153 Conn. 72, 87, 214 A.2d 362; State v. Pundy, 147 Conn. 7, 9, 156 A.2d 193; State v. Bill, 146 Conn. 693, 694, 155 A.2d 752.

There was evidence that on October 1,1960, a man entered a package store in New Britain known as the North Package Store. He ordered four bottles of liquor and tendered a check for $93.20 in payment. This check was forged and was one of several stolen from the office of Emil Polce and Sons in Hartford. The main defense was that it was a case of mistaken identity. There was ample evidence to support the court’s conclusion beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was the man who entered the North Package Store on October 1, 1960, and tendered the forged check in payment of his purchase of the four bottles of liquor, and that he was guilty as charged.

There is no error.

In this opinion the other judges concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Chisolm
328 A.2d 677 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1973)
State v. Delgado
290 A.2d 338 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1971)
State v. Cobuzzi
288 A.2d 439 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1971)
State v. Briggs
287 A.2d 369 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1971)
State v. Whitney
249 A.2d 238 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1968)
State v. Hassett
230 A.2d 553 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1967)
State v. White
230 A.2d 18 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1967)
State v. Stallings
224 A.2d 718 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1966)
State v. Hodge
219 A.2d 367 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1966)
State v. Jones
217 A.2d 691 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
215 A.2d 414, 153 Conn. 228, 1965 Conn. LEXIS 425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-davis-conn-1965.