State v. Davis-Bey

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Davis-Bey

872 S.W.2d 177, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 469, 1994 WL 88098

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 22, 1994·No. Nos. 61853, 63595·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

A jury convicted defendant of one count of first degree burglary and one count of misdemeanor stealing, in violation of §§ 569.160 and 570.030, RSMo 1986. Defendant raises two points on direct appeal. He also raises two points concerning the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

A jury convicted defendant of one count of first degree burglary and one count of misdemeanor stealing, in violation of §§ 569.160 and 570.030, RSMo 1986. Defendant raises two points on direct appeal. He also raises two points concerning the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

State v. Davis-Bey, 872 S.W.2d 177, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 469, 1994 WL 88098 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

872 S.W.2d 177 (State v. Davis-Bey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.