State v. Davies

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

State v. Davies

25 A.D.2d 690, 268 N.Y.S.2d 927, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4718

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 25, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 25 A.D.2d 690 (State v. Davies) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Davies, 25 A.D.2d 690, 268 N.Y.S.2d 927, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4718 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to resettle order, and for permission to appeal -to the Court of Appeals from the resettled order, granted, without costs. Decision dated December 20, 1965 [24 A D 2d 240], amended to read “Judgment and order reversed, on the law, without costs”; decretal paragraph of order entered December 23, 1965, resettled to provide “ Ordered and Adjudged that the order and judgment appealed from be reversed, on the law, without costs.” No issue of fact was considered by this court. The following question shall be certified to the Court of Appeals: “Was the Appellate Division correct in reversing, on the law, the order and judgment dismissing the complaint as to the defendant-respondent?” Motion for a stay granted, without costs.

Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Taylor and Aulisi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to resettle order, and for permission to appeal -to the Court of Appeals from the resettled order, granted, without costs. Decision dated December 20, 1965 [24 A D 2d 240], amended to read “Judgment and order reversed, on the law, without costs”; decretal paragraph of order entered December 23, 1965, resettled to provide “ Ordered and Adjudged that the order and judgment appealed from be reversed, on the law, without costs.” No issue of fact was considered by this court. The following question shall be certified to the Court of Appeals: “Was the Appellate Division correct in reversing, on the law, the order and judgment dismissing the complaint as to the defendant-respondent?” Motion for a stay granted, without costs.

Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Taylor and Aulisi, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 A.D.2d 690, 268 N.Y.S.2d 927, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-davies-nyappdiv-1966.