State v. Davidson

Texas Supreme Court

State v. Davidson

36 Tex. 325

CourtTexas Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1872

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 36 Tex. 325 (State v. Davidson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Davidson, 36 Tex. 325 (Tex. 1872).

Pincite

Opinion

Ogden, J.

There is no error in the judgment of the Distriet Court in quashing the indictment. The defendants are charged with the commission of an offense some ten months after the indictment was found. This may have been a clerical error in drawing the indictment, but the error, if such, occurred in the material portion of the charge, and is therefore fatal to the indictment, which could not have been amended in that particular.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ogden, J.

There is no error in the judgment of the Distriet Court in quashing the indictment. The defendants are charged with the commission of an offense some ten months after the indictment was found. This may have been a clerical error in drawing the indictment, but the error, if such, occurred in the material portion of the charge, and is therefore fatal to the indictment, which could not have been amended in that particular.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

36 Tex. 325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-davidson-tex-1872.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack