State v. Davidson
36 Tex. 325
Opinion
There is no error in the judgment of the Distriet Court in quashing the indictment. The defendants are charged with the commission of an offense some ten months after the indictment was found. This may have been a clerical error in drawing the indictment, but the error, if such, occurred in the material portion of the charge, and is therefore fatal to the indictment, which could not have been amended in that particular.
The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Davidson, 36 Tex. 325 (Tex. 1872).
36 Tex. 325 (State v. Davidson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Bornemann
35 F. 824 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California, 1888)
State v. Ingalls
59 N.H. 88 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1879)