State v. Davidson
This text of 419 P.2d 942 (State v. Davidson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant appeals from a conviction of the crime of unlawfully selling shares of the capital stock of a corporation which had not been registered with [637]*637the Oregon Corporation Commissioner, in violation of ORS 59.130. Defendant’s sole contention is that he is entitled to reversal because the court denied his motion for a continuance. There is no proper assignment of error in the brief as required by Rule 19. The motion for continuance is not set out in substance, or otherwise. Rule 19 provides: “Assignments of error which the court can consider only by searching the record for the proceedings complained of will not be considered.” This is such a case and we will not consider the alleged error.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
419 P.2d 942, 244 Or. 636, 1966 Ore. LEXIS 503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-davidson-or-1966.