State v. Davidson

535 A.2d 442, 1988 Me. LEXIS 7
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJanuary 12, 1988
StatusPublished

This text of 535 A.2d 442 (State v. Davidson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Davidson, 535 A.2d 442, 1988 Me. LEXIS 7 (Me. 1988).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

On appeal from the judgment of the Superior Court (Kennebec County) entered on a jury verdict convicting him of Class C assault in violation of 17-A M.R.S.A. § 207 (1983 & Supp.1987), Michael Davidson claims that the court erred in admitting certain photographs into evidence and challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. The court acted within its discretion in finding that the photographs’ probative value was not substantially outweighed by danger of unfair prejudice to defendant. See M.R.Evid. 403. On the basis of all the evidence viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, the jury rationally could find beyond a reasonable doubt every element of the crime of Class C assault. See State v. Barry, 495 A.2d 825, 826 (Me.1985).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Barry
495 A.2d 825 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
535 A.2d 442, 1988 Me. LEXIS 7, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-davidson-me-1988.