Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. David

State v. David

795 P.2d 121, 102 Or. App. 685, 1990 Ore. App. LEXIS 865
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedAugust 1, 1990
DocketP090361; CA A61956
StatusPublished

This text of 795 P.2d 121 (State v. David) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. David, 795 P.2d 121, 102 Or. App. 685, 1990 Ore. App. LEXIS 865 (Or. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants. The trial was to the court without a jury, and defendant elected to represent himself. On appeal, he contends that he was not properly advised of the consequences of proceeding pro se and, therefore, that his waiver of counsel was not valid. The state concedes that defendant is correct, and we agree. State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Cheney, 96 Or App 680, 773 P2d 1351 (1989); State v. Boswell, 92 Or App 652, 760 P2d 276 (1988).

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Boswell
760 P.2d 276 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1988)
State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Cheney
773 P.2d 1351 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
795 P.2d 121, 102 Or. App. 685, 1990 Ore. App. LEXIS 865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-david-orctapp-1990.